Main reasons :
- Numbers killed often are, thankfully, too low for any statistically-significant conclusions to be drawn until many years have passed.
- Serious Injuries are usually about ten times more frequent, and often life-changing. So taking measures to reduce them is arguably just as important as reducing fatalities.
- Many other factors affect whether a casualty dies :
- Vehicle engineering - crumple zones, airbags, seat-belts, safety glass
- Emergency service response, particularly Air Ambulances
- Medical care in hospital
Further than that, there are many 'Quality of Life' issues that are worth considering.
I remember a reading a book about skiing, that quoted a racing driver:
- Perceived Safety
- Improved lifestyle
- Community well-being
- Stress and Mental Health
I remember a reading a book about skiing, that quoted a racing driver:
"To move is to risk death : not to move is to be dead already" [citation needed]I first started thinking about this after reading a report by Eric Bridgstock, aka 'Independent Road Safety Research', campaigning against reducing 30mph speed limits to 20mph.
This still puzzles me:
See also
"Who in their right mind would centre their safety policy on “hitting people at slower speeds kills fewer of them”? I have seen numerous examples of this type of mantra and they are all repugnant."I don't think he means we should consider 'Quality of Life' issues in addition to fatalities (or even instead), because he goes on to say
- "So why did these schemes fail? Vulnerable road users are encouraged to feel safer – a natural instinct when traffic is slower."
- Roads “feeling safe” lead to less care/attention by pedestrians/cyclists
- “Quality of Life” arguments are specious when offset by increased casualties
See also
- Near Misses - [ Motorism - a failure of democracy ! ]
- A Different Kind of Sanity - [ Motorism - a failure of democracy ! ]
- Investigating the rates and impacts of near misses and related incidents among UK cyclists - [ Science Direct ]
- Bicycling campaigns promoting health versus campaigns promoting safety: A randomized controlled online study of ‘dangerization - [ Science Direct ]
- Road safety versus saving lives - [ movementsci ]
- Are cars the new tobacco? - [ Journal of Public Health ]
- How are cyclists most likely to die? - [ The Guardian ]
- 'Cycling death worth it' - [ Warning - Keith Peat! ]
- Trip to the therapist drives out demons for stressed out bikers - [ London Evening Standard ]
No comments:
Post a Comment